A Call To The Remnant

Scottish Warriors for Christ- http://www.facebook.com/acalltotheremnant

The last words of Tozer-a dangerous read.

Posted by appolus on March 20, 2019

THE WANING AUTHORITY OF CHRIST IN THE CHURCHES

HERE IS THE BURDEN of my heart; and while I claim for myself no special inspiration I yet feel that this is also the burden of the Spirit.

If I know my own heart it is love alone that moves me to write this. What I write here is not the sour ferment of a mind agitated by contentions with my fellow Christians. There have been no such contentions. I have not been abused, mistreated or attacked by anyone. Nor have these observations grown out of any unpleasant experiences that I have had in my association with others. My relations with my own church as well as with Christians of other denominations have been friendly, courteous and pleasant. My grief is simply the result of a condition which I believe to be almost universally prevalent among the churches.

I think also that I should acknowledge that I am myself very much involved in the situation I here deplore. As Ezra in his mighty prayer of intercession included himself among the wrongdoers, so do I. “0 my God, I am ashamed and blush to lift up my face to thee, my God: for our iniquities are increased over our head, and our trespass is grown up unto the heavens.” Any hard word spoken here against others must in simple honesty return upon my own head. I too have been guilty. This is written with the hope that we all may turn unto the Lord our God and sin no more against Him.

Let me state the cause of my burden. It is this: Jesus Christ has today almost no authority at all among the groups that call themselves by His name. By these I mean not the Roman Catholics nor the liberals, nor the various quasi-Christian cults. I do mean Protestant churches generally, and I include those that protest the loudest that they are in spiritual descent from our Lord and His apostles, namely, the evangelicals.

It is a basic doctrine of the New Testament that after His resurrection the Man Jesus was declared by God to be both Lord and Christ, and that He was invested by the Father with absolute Lordship over the church which is His Body. All authority is His in heaven and in earth. In His own proper time He will exert it to the full, but during this period in history He allows this authority to be challenged or ignored. And just now it is being challenged by the world and ignored by the church.

The present position of Christ in the gospel churches may be likened to that of a king in a limited, constitutional monarchy. The king (sometimes depersonalized by the term “the Crown”) is in such a country no more than a traditional rallying point, a pleasant symbol of unity and loyalty much like a flag or a national anthem. He is lauded, feted and supported, but his real authority is small. Nominally he is head over all, but in every crisis someone else makes the decisions. On formal occasions he appears in his royal attire to deliver the tame, colorless speech put into his mouth by the real rulers of the country. The whole thing may be no more than good-natured make-believe, but it is rooted in antiquity, it is a lot of fun and no one wants to give it up.

Among the gospel churches Christ is now in fact little more than a beloved symbol. “All Hail the Power of Jesus’ Name” is the church’s national anthem and the cross is her official flag, but in the week-by-week services of the church and the day-by-day conduct of her members someone else, not Christ, makes the decisions. Under proper circumstances Christ is allowed to say “Come unto me, all ye that labour and are heavy laden” or “Let not your heart be troubled,” but when the speech is finished someone else takes over. Those in actual authority decide the moral standards of the church, as well as all objectives and all methods employed to achieve them. Because of long and meticulous organization it is now possible for the youngest pastor just out of seminary to have more actual authority in a church than Jesus Christ has.

Not only does Christ have little or no authority; His influence also is becoming less and less. I would not say that He has none, only that it is small and diminishing. A fair parallel would be the influence of Abraham Lincoln over the American people. Honest Abe is still the idol of the country. The likeness of his kind, rugged face, so homely that it is beautiful, appears everywhere. It is easy to grow misty-eyed over him. Children are brought up on stories of his love, his honesty and his humility.

But after we have gotten control over our tender emotions what have we left? No more than a good example which, as it recedes into the past, becomes more and more unreal and exercises less and less real influence. Every scoundrel is ready to wrap Lincoln’s long black coat around him. In the cold light of political facts in the United States the constant appeal to Lincoln by the politicians is a cynical joke.

The Lordship of Jesus is not quite forgotten among Christians, but it has been relegated to the hymnal where all responsibility toward it may be comfortably discharged in a glow of pleasant religious emotion. Or if it is taught as a theory in the classroom it is rarely applied to practical living. The idea that the Man Christ Jesus has absolute and final authority over the whole church and over all of its members in every detail of their lives is simply not now accepted as true by the rank and file of evangelical Christians.

What we do is this: We accept the Christianity of our group as being identical with that of Christ and His apostles. The beliefs, the practices, the ethics, the activities of our group are equated with the Christianity of the New Testament. Whatever the group thinks or says or does is scriptural, no questions asked. It is assumed that all our Lord expects of us is that we busy ourselves with the activities of the group. In so doing we are keeping the commandments of Christ.

To avoid the hard necessity of either obeying or rejecting the plain instructions of our Lord in the New Testament we take refuge in a liberal interpretation of them. Casuistry is not the possession of Roman Catholic theologians alone. We evangelicals also know how to avoid the sharp point of obedience by means of fine and intricate explanations. These are tailor-made for the flesh. They excuse disobedience, comfort carnality and make the words of Christ of none effect. And the essence of it all is that Christ simply could not have meant what He said. His teachings are accepted even theoretically only after they have been weakened by interpretation.

Yet Christ is consulted by increasing numbers of persons with “problems” and sought after by those who long for peace of mind. He is widely recommended as a kind of spiritual psychiatrist with remarkable powers to straighten people out. He is able to deliver them from their guilt complexes and to help them to avoid serious psychic traumas by making a smooth and easy adjustment to society and to their own ids. Of course this strange Christ has no relation whatever to the Christ of the New Testament. The true Christ is also Lord, but this accommodating Christ is little more than the servant of the people.

But I suppose I should offer some concrete proof to support my charge that Christ has little or no authority today among the churches. Well, let me put a few questions and let the answers be the evidence.

What church board consults our Lord’s words to decide matters under discussion? Let anyone reading this who has had experience on a church board try to recall the times or time when any board member read from the Scriptures to make a point, or when any chairman suggested that the brethren should see what instructions the Lord had for them on a particular question. Board meetings are habitually opened with a formal prayer or “a season of prayer”; after that the Head of the Church is respectfully silent while the real rulers take over. Let anyone who denies this bring forth evidence to refute it. I for one will be glad to hear it.

What Sunday school committee goes to the Word for directions? Do not the members invariably assume that they already know what they are supposed to do and that their only problem is to find effective means to get it done? Plans, rules, “operations” and new methodological techniques absorb all their time and attention. The prayer before the meeting is for divine help to carry out their plans. Apparently the idea that the Lord might have some instructions for them never so much as enters their heads.

Who remembers when a conference chairman brought his Bible to the table with him for the purpose of using it? Minutes, regulations, rules of order, yes. The sacred commandments of the Lord, no. An absolute dichotomy exists between the devotional period and the business session. The first has no relation to the second.

What foreign mission board actually seeks to follow the guidance of the Lord as provided by His Word and His Spirit? They all think they do, but what they do in fact is to assume the scripturalness of their ends and then ask for help to find ways to achieve them. They may pray all night for God to give success to their enterprises, but Christ is desired as their helper, not as their Lord. Human means are devised to achieve ends assumed to be divine. These harden into policy, and thereafter the Lord doesn’t even have a vote.

In the conduct of our public worship where is the authority of Christ to be found? The truth is that today the Lord rarely controls a service, and the influence He exerts is very small. We sing of Him and preach about Him, but He must not interfere; we worship our way, and it must be right because we have always done it that way, as have the other churches in our group.

What Christian when faced with a moral problem goes straight to the Sermon on the Mount or other New Testament Scripture for the authoritative answer? Who lets the words of Christ be final on giving, birth control, the bringing up of a family, personal habits, tithing, entertainment, buying, selling and other such important matters?

What theological school, from the lowly Bible institute up, could continue to operate if it were to make Christ Lord of its every policy? There may be some, and I hope there are, but I believe I am right when I say that most such “schools” to stay in business are forced to adopt procedures which find no justification in the Bible they profess to teach. So we have this strange anomaly: the authority of Christ is ignored in order to maintain a school to teach among other things the authority of Christ.

The causes back of the decline in our Lord’s authority are many. I name only two.

One is the power of custom, precedent and tradition within the older religious groups. These like gravitation affect every particle of religious practice within the group, exerting a steady and constant pressure in one direction. Of course that direction is toward conformity to the status quo. Not Christ but custom is lord in this situation. And the same thing has passed over (possibly to a slightly lesser degree) into the other groups such as the full gospel tabernacles, the holiness churches, the pentecostal and fundamental churches and the many independent and undenominational churches found everywhere throughout the North American continent.

The second cause is the revival of intellectualism among the evangelicals. This, if I sense the situation correctly, is not so much a thirst for learning as a desire for a reputation of being learned. Because of it good men who ought to know better are being put in the position of collaborating with the enemy. I’ll explain.

Our evangelical faith (which I believe to be the true faith of Christ and His apostles) is being attacked these days from many different directions. In the Western world the enemy has forsworn violence. He comes against us no more with sword and fagot [a bundle of sticks used as a torch]; he now comes smiling, bearing gifts. He raises his eyes to heaven and swears that he too believes in the faith of our fathers, but his real purpose is to destroy that faith, or at least to modify it to such an extent that it is no longer the supernatural thing it once was. He comes in the name of philosophy or psychology or anthropology, and with sweet reasonableness urges us to rethink our historic position, to be less rigid, more tolerant, more broadly understanding.

He speaks in the sacred jargon of the schools, and many of our half-educated evangelicals run to fawn on him. He tosses academic degrees to the scrambling sons of the prophets as Rockefeller used to toss dimes to the children of the peasants. The evangelicals who, with some justification, have been accused of lacking true scholarship, now grab for these status symbols with shining eyes, and when they get them they are scarcely able to believe their eyes. They walk about in a kind of ecstatic unbelief, much as the soloist of the neighborhood church choir might were she to be invited to sing at La Scala.

For the true Christian the one supreme test for the present soundness and ultimate worth of everything religious must be the place our Lord occupies in it. Is He Lord or symbol? Is He in charge of the project or merely one of the crew? Does He decide things or only help to carry out the plans of others? All religious activities, from the simplest act of an individual Christian to the ponderous and expensive operations of a whole denomination, may be proved by the answer to the question, Is Jesus Christ Lord in this act? Whether our works prove to be wood, hay and stubble or gold and silver and precious stones in that great day will depend upon the right answer to that question.

What, then, are we to do? Each one of us must decide, and there are at least three possible choices. One is to rise up in shocked indignation and accuse me of irresponsible reporting. Another is to nod general agreement with what is written here but take comfort in the fact that there are exceptions and we are among the exceptions. The other is to go down in meek humility and confess that we have grieved the Spirit and dishonored our Lord in failing to give Him the place His Father has given Him as Head and Lord of the Church.

Either the first or the second will but confirm the wrong. The third if carried out to its conclusion can remove the curse. The decision lies with us.

9 Responses to “The last words of Tozer-a dangerous read.”

  1. Scott Price said

    Hi Brother Frank. In the corporate and in the individual, far too often what man strongly “thinks” or strongly “feels” is the compass. If I hear one more time “I think this or I feel that” from a Christian I shall explode. The mind of Christ and the desires of His Spirit have lost the preeminence. I know you have a great burden for the Church as a body as do I and my burden is also for each individual brother and sister that their individual lives and daily living would be completely yielded and governed by the claims and authority of the Master as a living voice and guide. If we can gather together as a body that has individually each day already followed the Spirit, then we will bring to each assembly we have the power of God and the nature of God to share with others. The presence of God in the body starts at the bottom with each person and not at the top from any elder.

    • appolus said

      Hi bro Scott. I hear what you are saying brother and agree with most if it. When it comes to the corporate setting I would simply disagree with your assertion. First of all I believe that the Spirit can be quenched, perhaps you do not? Anyway, leadership within the corporate setting “sets the stage,” so to speak. It can promote freedom or it can squelch it. What Tozer was getting at, and I totally agree with, is that the authority in the church, for the most part, lies in the hands of men and not God. The system itself is by design, albeit it probably unintentional in the beginning, fatally flawed and robs the gathering of the preeminence of Jesus and His Holy Spirit.I believe that in the end , because of persecution, that there will either be the great whore church or secret gatherings of saints. In part this is a judgement on a system that has “robbed,” the Lord of His proper place in the gathering……………….bro Frank

      • Scott Price said

        Hi Brother Frank, I totally agree that the leadership can quench the Spirit. Individuals can also quench the Spirit for themselves. My point was that the “church” is in the daily life of the believers far more than the weekly gatherings. If the believers are living and walking in the Spirit daily, it will have a dramatic impact on the assembly. The Spirit filled will depart if it doesn’t. I’m concerned that too many people come to the assembly looking for the Spirit to fall when what should be happening is that the weekly gathering is more of an outpouring of the Spirit that has already filled the faithful all week. I’m in total agreement with you about quenching of the Spirit by the leadership at weekly meetings. i’m striving for myself for a daily filling of the Spirit that can overflow into edification and strengthening when I come into the presence to love other brothers and sisters either in small get togethers or in the weekly meeting. Changing the mindset of worship from consumers to producers and giving room for that to happen is the responsibility of the leadership for the weekly gatherings. Changing the mindset for myself in daily life is my own responsibility.

        • Robert Price said

          I also want to affirm in complete agreement with you and Tozer that Jesus is a mere bystander, if that, in many many churches because of man led assemblies with human strategies depending on man’s strength. Hosea 14 comes to mind to describe the current status in the west most clearly.

          • appolus said

            Is Scott and Robert the same person? 🙂 I think the notion that one could be filled with the Spirit of God and then go to you average assembly on a Sunday morning and have an influence on that public assembly might be a tad bit naive. The system compels you to remain quiet and only listen………………bro Frank

  2. Rebecca said

    Brother Frank,

    There is evil for good and good looked at as evil. This is both prevalent in society and has invaded into what we call ‘church.’ There is a form of godliness without the power. “There is no repairer of the breech”… when His Holy Spirit said this in my ear I heard the word ‘no’… repairer of the breech’ … this convicted me. I had to take a hard look at myself and repent. We are to be the salt that preserves … we are to be the light that dispels the darkness.

    Years ago a man in a Bible book store told me if “we had spoken out prayer would not have been taken out of our schools. Our children are being indoctrinated to accept immorality and what God hates.They are being groomed into the belief they are independent and self sufficient all the while they are being taught witchcraft. I heard a character in a children’s cartoon call the bible a “A dusty old thing” … he threw it down and picked up a sorcerer’s manual.

    This did not happen over night … it has been an insidious process. Words have a powerful impact. The word ‘church’ is a insidious yet powerful tool Satan has honed and uses to deceive. It is often reflected on as a place to gather as Christians but truly we are to be the called out ones … separate from the world … in the world but not of the world. The church has all the gilts and showmanship that tickle the ears but Christ is really not a part of it.

    I speak out but very seldom do I now intercede in prayer for the state of our country. His Holy Spirit said, “Prepare to meet the LORD.”
    You answered Scott saying “the system” is fatally flawed and robs the preeminence of Jesus and His Holy Spirit.” A few weeks ago I went to a church to hear the youth pastor speak about what he labeled “American Christianity … Sunday; Wednesday and maybe a Bible study group.” My ears perked up to hear his solution but he did not bring one forth. The church has built a wall with untempered mortar. This country can build all the physical wall she desires but the spiritual wall has already been breached .

    Persecution will come … like you say in so many different ways there will be a remnant who will stand to endure. But the so called main stream church will not stand. I reflect on the ‘churches’ of today and the words of Jesus to feel a mixture of emotions. I feel fear for the people who think they are safe yet are being led down a broad path and that they love it so … I feel ashamed and want to distance myself. Yet somehow I am also drawn. God loves all people and I am a sinner saved only because of grace. I miss a true fellowship … but it seems when I talk about the LORD or speak out most look at me to smile or look right past me. It is like something I can not describe but so entrenched is the practice of church they are blind.

    Years ago His Holy Spirit said, “Habakkuk and you can not serve two masters.” This was during the 2009 inauguration We are called to warn or else the blood is on our hands. We are to be watchmen on the wall. All is to be done in love but the warning must come none the less. I think of Daniel who was beloved of God yet he went into captivity with the rest. He stood out, in a pagan society, as a beacon of light. I often think of God’s lament, “I sought a man who would make a wall and stand in the gap so I would not destroy the land but found no one.”

    Now we have immorality that is so embedded in society … sacrifice of God’s children …His inheritance … to a god called choice. Scripture says “they won’t repent of their immorality” I won’t list all the sin that is so blatantly immoral going on right before our eyes. God has sent prophetic voices to warn and plead for repentance and a turning back to Him. He has sent what we call ‘natural disasters’ to warn of impending judgement … scripture tells us His pattern of judgement … eventually if not next will come the sword. And with the sword there is always a persecution. It is already happening … America is not going to be spared as some think.

    Grace is free but will cost us everything. I think of Daniel and his three friends. They refused to bow and Daniel continued to pray even though the edict was against it. We must make up our minds now because it is coming. Our faith will be tested. God has his remnant in wilderness places for a purpose. He is preparing us for a more severe test of our faith. This is nothing of what is to come. Now is the time to examine and judge ourselves. Now is the time to draw closer to Christ… a time to stay in The Word and to let Him prune no matter the pain. There is nothing on this earth worth selling out Jesus. Nothing!

    Sorry so long.

    Rebecca

    • appolus said

      Not at all sister, it was so edifying that I do not plan to add anything to it, may your words bless and challenge those who read them. The Spirit of the Lord in me witnesses with every word you wrote. In fact, as you spoke about about the edicts that Daniel and the three young Hebrews had to deal with, it registered with me. Dont be surprised if you see a post soon using those incidents to highlight what is shorty coming to the saints in the West, in many other places it is already happening………………………bro Frank

  3. Scott Price said

    Yes, same person. Sorry for that. I’m not really that naive. 🙂 I understand the restrictions during meetings. I attended and have been frustrated in many nominal churches and was part of a vibrant spirit filled home fellowship at my house. I was merely suggesting that if there are more Spirit filled people in the pews, we might be surprised how the leadership would either change or move on thus creating a more Spirit directed and filled meeting with much broader participation as intended. We are seeing the same problem. I agree the leadership models are in the way of what God intends for His people. But, at the same time, lament that many of the body just have not pursued the filling of the Spirit in their own daily lives. I can’t say one cause is more important than the other in terms of analyzing the root issues and in terms of the solution. I think the leaders must repent but I also believe in the repentance of the faithful for not being more Spirit filled themselves on a daily basis. The early church was far more organic and Spirit led and filled at the individual level and I think that has a dramatic influence on leadership. You clearly see the problem primarily as a leadership or systemic issue. Institutionalization on a human level usually occurs because that is what the people want because they want a “king” just like the world for their organizations. Our churches suffer the same wrong desires as the Israelites did when they called for a human king. When the people are satisfied with Jesus as their King, then the leadership looks entirely different.

    • appolus said

      Hi Scott, I think the points that you raise are perfectly valid and I am all for people being baptized in the Holy Spirit and refreshed and continually moving in Him on a daily basis. And yes I do see the problem as an institutional one, I believe that was also the point that Tozer was making, so if it were true back in the 60s when he wrote it, the problem has only intensified and magnified greatly in the last few decades. And you are exactly right, people want a king. People dont want to speak directly to God in the fire and smoke of the mountain, they want an intermediary. Yet the word tells us that there is one mediator between man and God, Jesus. If we speak through an intermediary then His glory is inevitably veiled and this is what we see in the vast majority of congregations, shades of grey that pass for light……………….bro Frank

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

 
%d bloggers like this: